Skip to content

Document reproducibility (#298)#304

Open
tomwhite wants to merge 1 commit intolmcinnes:0.4devfrom
tomwhite:reproducibility-doc-0.4dev
Open

Document reproducibility (#298)#304
tomwhite wants to merge 1 commit intolmcinnes:0.4devfrom
tomwhite:reproducibility-doc-0.4dev

Conversation

@tomwhite
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@tomwhite tomwhite commented Oct 2, 2019

Happy to hear any suggestions on wording, etc.

I also updated the 'Is there GPU or multicore-CPU support?' FAQ since it was related.

@tomwhite tomwhite requested a review from lmcinnes October 2, 2019 10:05
@coveralls
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coveralls commented Oct 2, 2019

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 86.855% when pulling b014faf on tomwhite:reproducibility-doc-0.4dev into d214e5d on lmcinnes:0.4dev.

@sleighsoft
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Adding reference #298

Comment thread doc/faq.rst Outdated
Comment thread umap/umap_.py
@sleighsoft
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@tomwhite So random_state=None seems the way to go in the discussion. Sorry for the trouble tom.

Update 'Is there GPU or multicore-CPU support?' FAQ
@tomwhite tomwhite force-pushed the reproducibility-doc-0.4dev branch from efcb1e1 to b014faf Compare October 9, 2019 09:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants