You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: CLAUDE.md
+16-11Lines changed: 16 additions & 11 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
6
6
7
7
## Project Identity
8
8
9
-
**RAXION** is a sovereign Layer-1 blockchain (Sovereign SVM Rollup on Solana) that proves AI inference quality mathematically — replacing human subjective consensus with cryptographic proofs.
9
+
**RAXION** is a Sovereign SVM Rollup settled on Solana that proves AI inference quality mathematically — replacing human subjective consensus with cryptographic proofs.
10
10
11
11
**Core thesis**: Bittensor's failure is not an implementation problem. It is an axiom problem. Any system with a human in the inference evaluation loop inherits the Oracle Problem. RAXION removes the human entirely.
12
12
@@ -16,15 +16,15 @@
16
16
17
17
## Current Phase
18
18
19
-
**Phase 0 — Genesis (Q1 2026)**
19
+
**Phase 1 — Devnet (Q2 2026)**
20
20
21
21
Active work:
22
-
-Whitepaper v1.0 complete ✅
23
-
-Python PoC: validate convergence between 2 architectures on 100+ queries
24
-
- RISC Zero: basic proof-of-execution for simple model
25
-
-Repository setup with contributor-ready issues
22
+
-PoIQ v0.1 on-chain path and deterministic challenge flow
23
+
-Runtime cognitive extensions and SDK stabilization
24
+
- RISC Zero embedding commitment path validation
25
+
-Devnet explorer hardening and deployment flow
26
26
27
-
**Do not** ask Claude to implement Agave fork, on-chain programs, or token mechanics yet. Those are Phase 1 (Q2 2026).
27
+
**Do not** ask Claude to implement Testnet/Mainnet-only scope (GPU proving, full 6 challenge categories, TGE tokenomics) yet.
28
28
29
29
---
30
30
@@ -43,6 +43,11 @@ Read this before asking "why didn't you just...":
43
43
| No optimistic assumptions | Cognitive consequences are irreversible; 7-day challenge windows allow harmful propagation | Optimistic rollup-style contestation |
44
44
| Jolt for quality proofs | 10–100x faster than RISC Zero for matrix operations / embedding similarity | RISC Zero for everything |
45
45
| α=0.4, β=0.6 weighting | Causal coherence is more robust than surface embedding similarity | Equal weighting |
| Stake source-of-truth is protocol stake PDA | Financial math must use synchronized protocol-owned state; scheduler cache is non-canonical | CognitiveAccount cache or SPL token account as slash source |
|`is_final` depends on challenge lifecycle | Enforces that challenged inferences are not final until verified pass | Marking final immediately when score ≥0.60 |
50
+
| Q2 completion requires anti-manipulation invariants | Events alone are insufficient; deterministic challenge + stake constraints + on-chain derivation are mandatory | Declaring completion by happy-path event output |
46
51
47
52
---
48
53
@@ -102,8 +107,8 @@ consensus in decentralized AI with Proof of Inference Quality (PoIQ).
0 commit comments