Skip to content

Commit aaf4ff0

Browse files
Add Chronos–EntropyDepth theory definitions, lower bound, non-amplification lemma, example SAT distribution, and ED simulation script
1 parent ff3dcba commit aaf4ff0

6 files changed

Lines changed: 109 additions & 0 deletions

File tree

Lines changed: 17 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
1+
# Chronos–Entropy Bridge
2+
3+
Let
4+
5+
ΔI_t = I(X ; Y_t | Y_{<t})
6+
7+
Then
8+
9+
Σ ΔI_t ≤ T * C
10+
11+
where C is the transcript capacity constant.
12+
13+
Therefore
14+
15+
T ≥ H(X) / C.
16+
17+
This inequality is the Chronos refinement bound.

docs/theory/chronos_lower_bound.md

Lines changed: 25 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
1+
# Chronos Lower Bound
2+
3+
Let a refinement process satisfy
4+
5+
1. Locality constraint radius r
6+
2. Bounded transcript capacity
7+
3. FO^k definability of local operations
8+
9+
Then
10+
11+
I_t ≤ O(1)
12+
13+
for every step.
14+
15+
Therefore
16+
17+
ED ≥ Ω(H(X))
18+
19+
In SAT distributions with
20+
21+
H(X) = Θ(n)
22+
23+
we obtain
24+
25+
ED ≥ Ω(n).
Lines changed: 15 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
1+
# Configuration Non-Amplification Lemma
2+
3+
In FO^k refinement systems operating on bounded-degree graphs,
4+
5+
the conditional mutual information per refinement step
6+
is bounded by a constant.
7+
8+
Proof sketch:
9+
10+
1. FO^k operations inspect radius-r neighborhoods.
11+
2. The number of local types is finite.
12+
3. Transcript outputs lie in a finite alphabet.
13+
4. Therefore
14+
15+
I(X ; Y_t | history) ≤ log |Alphabet| = O(1).
Lines changed: 19 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
1+
# Entropy Depth (ED)
2+
3+
Let X be the hidden solution variable with entropy H(X).
4+
5+
Let Y_1, …, Y_T be the transcript produced by an algorithm.
6+
7+
Define the per-step information gain
8+
9+
I_t = I(X ; Y_t | Y_{<t})
10+
11+
The **Entropy Depth** of the process is
12+
13+
ED = min T such that
14+
Σ_{t=1}^T I_t ≥ H(X).
15+
16+
Interpretation:
17+
18+
ED measures the minimal number of sequential refinement
19+
steps required to extract all solution entropy.

examples/sat_entropy_instance.md

Lines changed: 18 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
1+
# Hard SAT Distribution
2+
3+
Construct random XOR-SAT instances:
4+
5+
m = Θ(n)
6+
variables = n
7+
8+
Solution entropy
9+
10+
H(X) = Θ(n)
11+
12+
Since
13+
14+
I_t ≤ O(1)
15+
16+
any FO^k refinement algorithm must satisfy
17+
18+
T ≥ Ω(n).

scripts/entropy_depth_demo.py

Lines changed: 15 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
1+
import numpy as np
2+
3+
def simulate_entropy_depth(n, info_per_step=1):
4+
H = n
5+
steps = 0
6+
gained = 0
7+
8+
while gained < H:
9+
gained += info_per_step
10+
steps += 1
11+
12+
return steps
13+
14+
for n in [100, 500, 1000]:
15+
print(n, simulate_entropy_depth(n))

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)