ExpectColumnValuesToBeOfType dq rule is not returning expected result format

[divdeconnct]

https://github.com/great-expectations/great_expectations/blob/develop/great_expectations/expectations/core/expect_column_values_to_be_of_type.py
ExpectColumnValuesToBeOfType - is not returning expected result format described in the https://greatexpectations.io/expectations/expect_column_values_to_be_of_type/

On the success/failure case Result format should contain - element_count,unexpected_count etc fields,
Rather it is having only ObservedType in the output.

"exception_info": {
"raised_exception": false,
"exception_traceback": null,
"exception_message": null
},
"result": {
"element_count": 3,
"unexpected_count": 0,
"unexpected_percent": 0.0,
"partial_unexpected_list": [],
"missing_count": 0,
"missing_percent": 0.0,
"unexpected_percent_total": 0.0,
"unexpected_percent_nonmissing": 0.0
},
"meta": {},
"success": true
}

• Operating System: Windows
• Great Expectations Version: 0.18
• Data Source: Databricks/Spark
• Cloud environment: Databricks

The sample code, I have got from data quality rule - expect_column_values_to_be_null.py
from https://github.com/great-expectations/great_expectations/blob/develop/great_expectations/expectations/core/expect_column_values_to_be_null.py

Result_format is not defined as similar to above data quality rule for expect_column_values_to_be_of_type

from great_expectations.expectations.expectation_configuration import (
parse_result_format,
)
return _format_map_output(
result_format=parse_result_format(result_format),
success=success,
element_count=metrics.get("table.row_count"),
nonnull_count=nonnull_count,
unexpected_count=metrics.get(
f"{self.map_metric}.{SummarizationMetricNameSuffixes.UNEXPECTED_COUNT.value}"
),
unexpected_list=metrics.get(
f"{self.map_metric}.{SummarizationMetricNameSuffixes.UNEXPECTED_VALUES.value}"
),
unexpected_index_list=metrics.get(
f"{self.map_metric}.{SummarizationMetricNameSuffixes.UNEXPECTED_INDEX_LIST.value}"
),
unexpected_index_query=metrics.get(
f"{self.map_metric}.{SummarizationMetricNameSuffixes.UNEXPECTED_INDEX_QUERY.value}"
)

[adeola-ak]

Hi there, thanks for bringing this to our attention. We're aware that this isn't behaving as expected. While we haven't yet prioritized a fix, we do plan to update our documentation to reflect the current behavior. I'll follow up with the team to see if this is something we can consider prioritizing, and I'll share any updates as they become available. Thanks again for your patience.