[refactor] perf(tests): reduce CancellationToken timeout from 1000ms to 50ms in PolicyFactoryTests, perf(tests): reduce CancellationToken timeout from 1000ms to 50ms in PolicyFactoryTests

Author: marwannettour

tests/ByteSync.Client.UnitTests/Services/Misc/Factories/PolicyFactoryTests.cs

@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ public async Task BuildFileUploadPolicy_ShouldRetry_On_HttpRequestException_Stat
         var policy = _factory.BuildFileUploadPolicy();
 
         using var cts = new CancellationTokenSource();
-        cts.CancelAfter(1000);
+        cts.CancelAfter(50);
 
         Func<Task> act = async () =>
         {
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ public async Task BuildFileUploadPolicy_ShouldRetry_On_ApiException_StatusCodes(
         var policy = _factory.BuildFileUploadPolicy();
 
         using var cts = new CancellationTokenSource();
-        cts.CancelAfter(1000);
+        cts.CancelAfter(50);
 
         Func<Task> act = async () => { await policy.ExecuteAsync(async _ => { throw new ApiException("api error", status); }, cts.Token); };
 

tests/ByteSync.Client.UnitTests/TestUtilities/Mine/TestRsa.cs

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ public void Test1_DifferentMessages()
         var publicKeys = new List<byte[]>();
         var encryptedMessages = new List<byte[]>();
 
-        for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++)
+        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
         {
             var rsaBob = RSA.Create(); // Alice can encrypt, Bob can decrypt
 
@@ -41,12 +41,12 @@ public void Test1_DifferentMessages()
             decryptedMessage.Should().Be(aliceMessage);
         }
 
-        publicKeys.Count.Should().Be(100);
-        encryptedMessages.Count.Should().Be(100);
+        publicKeys.Count.Should().Be(10);
+        encryptedMessages.Count.Should().Be(10);
 
         // We verify that the control we were applying works correctly
-        publicKeys.Any(pk => pk.SequenceEqual(publicKeys[50])).Should().BeTrue();
-        encryptedMessages.Any(em => em.SequenceEqual(encryptedMessages[50])).Should().BeTrue();
+        publicKeys.Any(pk => pk.SequenceEqual(publicKeys[5])).Should().BeTrue();
+        encryptedMessages.Any(em => em.SequenceEqual(encryptedMessages[5])).Should().BeTrue();
     }
 
     [Test]
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ public void Test1_SameMessages()
         var publicKeys = new List<byte[]>();
         var encryptedMessages = new List<byte[]>();
 
-        for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++)
+        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
         {
             var rsaBob = RSA.Create(); // Alice can encrypt, Bob can decrypt
 
@@ -82,18 +82,18 @@ public void Test1_SameMessages()
             decryptedMessage.Should().Be(aliceMessage);
         }
 
-        publicKeys.Count.Should().Be(100);
-        encryptedMessages.Count.Should().Be(100);
+        publicKeys.Count.Should().Be(10);
+        encryptedMessages.Count.Should().Be(10);
 
         // We verify that the control we were applying works correctly
-        publicKeys.Any(pk => pk.SequenceEqual(publicKeys[50])).Should().BeTrue();
-        encryptedMessages.Any(em => em.SequenceEqual(encryptedMessages[50])).Should().BeTrue();
+        publicKeys.Any(pk => pk.SequenceEqual(publicKeys[5])).Should().BeTrue();
+        encryptedMessages.Any(em => em.SequenceEqual(encryptedMessages[5])).Should().BeTrue();
     }
 
     [Test]
     public void Test1_PublicKeyUnicity()
     {
-        for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++)
+        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
         {
             var rsaBob = RSA.Create(); // Alice can encrypt, Bob can decrypt
 
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ public void Test1_PublicKeyUnicity()
     [Test]
     public void Test1_EncryptedMessageNonUnicity()
     {
-        for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++)
+        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
         {
             var rsaBob = RSA.Create(); // Alice can encrypt, Bob can decrypt